Dataset engineering
Source review, cleaning, normalization, labeling guidance, splits, lineage and quality checks aligned with the target task.
Adapt model behavior with evidence, not guesswork
MODEL TRAINING & FINE-TUNING
When prompting and retrieval cannot meet the requirement, we prepare domain data, run controlled training or fine-tuning experiments and integrate the resulting model into a measurable inference path.
A data and evaluation pipeline for changing model behavior deliberately.
When prompting and retrieval cannot meet the requirement, we prepare domain data, run controlled training or fine-tuning experiments and integrate the resulting model into a measurable inference path.
Source review, cleaning, normalization, labeling guidance, splits, lineage and quality checks aligned with the target task.
Supervised fine-tuning, continued adaptation or task-specific models where evidence supports the added complexity.
Held-out datasets, task metrics, qualitative rubrics, safety cases and comparison against simpler baselines.
Serving, batching, latency, hardware, privacy, monitoring and retraining triggers within the surrounding product.
How we choose between retrieval, fine-tuning and training
Training is not the default answer. We use the cheapest valid baseline first, measure the gap and add model adaptation only when it improves the behavior the product actually values.
Specify expected inputs, outputs, edge cases, quality threshold, privacy constraints and inference envelope.
Assess volume, representativeness, rights, leakage, labeling consistency and the cost of maintaining the dataset.
Compare baselines and adaptations with tracked configurations and held-out evaluation.
Package inference, monitor drift and failures and define the conditions for future data or model updates.
Model adaptation deliverables
Work is documented so a result can be reproduced, compared and maintained rather than depending on one opaque experiment.
Model adaptation deliverables
FAQ
That is rarely the economical product decision. We evaluate task-specific training and adaptation honestly and do not imply foundation-model scale without the data, compute and program required.
It depends on task complexity, model choice, label quality and the performance gap. A data audit and baseline experiment provide a more credible answer than a universal minimum.
We separate training, development and held-out evaluation data, track provenance and review near-duplicates and contamination risks.
NEXT STEP
A technical lead will review the current state and recommend the smallest useful next step.
Start a project