Model behavior
Prompt and context design, retrieval, dataset work, fine-tuning and task-specific evaluation.
AI ENGINEERING
Model adaptation, AI integrations, agentic workflows and realtime game AI backed by evaluation, backend services and cloud operations.
We connect the model layer to data, tools, permissions, application logic and observability so the result can be measured, operated and improved.
DISCIPLINE SCOPE
Our AI discipline spans product integration, retrieval, model training and fine-tuning, agent orchestration and realtime game AI. We choose between deterministic software, retrieval, model adaptation and generative behavior according to the task.
Backend & Cloud is part of the offer: authentication, data, queues, workers, APIs, persistence, observability and cost controls are what turn useful model behavior into a dependable workflow.
Prompt and context design, retrieval, dataset work, fine-tuning and task-specific evaluation.
Tools, explicit state, branching, validation, human approval and user-facing workflow.
APIs, data, queues, workers, permissions, deployment, tracing and usage controls.
Decision systems, navigation, tactics and simulation under frame-time and multiplayer constraints.
The model, application and operating system designed as one product.
We build AI product features and internal workflows that retrieve knowledge, produce structured results, call tools and connect to existing business systems. Permissions, validation, latency, cost and human review are engineered alongside model behavior.
Assistants, copilots, classification, extraction, summarization and generation embedded in a purposeful user workflow.
Ingestion, chunking, metadata, search, permissions and grounded response behavior over product or organizational data.
Models connected to APIs, databases, files and business tools through authenticated, validated and auditable actions.
Test datasets, structured checks, tracing, latency and cost measurement, fallback behavior and production monitoring.
How we move beyond an impressive prompt
We define the task and acceptable failure first, establish a baseline, then select the smallest combination of context, retrieval, model adaptation and deterministic code that meets the requirement.
Map users, inputs, desired output, permissions, risk, review needs and the measurable baseline.
Create representative test cases and compare approaches against quality, latency and cost.
Add data pipelines, tools, state, validation, security, retries and user-facing behavior.
Version prompts and configuration, trace outcomes, analyze failures and maintain a regression evaluation suite.
AI product deliverables
The output is a maintainable product system with measurable behavior, not a notebook or isolated API demonstration.
AI product deliverables
A data and evaluation pipeline for changing model behavior deliberately.
When prompting and retrieval cannot meet the requirement, we prepare domain data, run controlled training or fine-tuning experiments and integrate the resulting model into a measurable inference path.
Source review, cleaning, normalization, labeling guidance, splits, lineage and quality checks aligned with the target task.
Supervised fine-tuning, continued adaptation or task-specific models where evidence supports the added complexity.
Held-out datasets, task metrics, qualitative rubrics, safety cases and comparison against simpler baselines.
Serving, batching, latency, hardware, privacy, monitoring and retraining triggers within the surrounding product.
How we choose between retrieval, fine-tuning and training
Training is not the default answer. We use the cheapest valid baseline first, measure the gap and add model adaptation only when it improves the behavior the product actually values.
Specify expected inputs, outputs, edge cases, quality threshold, privacy constraints and inference envelope.
Assess volume, representativeness, rights, leakage, labeling consistency and the cost of maintaining the dataset.
Compare baselines and adaptations with tracked configurations and held-out evaluation.
Package inference, monitor drift and failures and define the conditions for future data or model updates.
Model adaptation deliverables
Work is documented so a result can be reproduced, compared and maintained rather than depending on one opaque experiment.
Model adaptation deliverables
Long-running AI workflows with explicit state and control.
We build systems in which models select or use tools across multiple steps, while deterministic application logic controls permissions, branching, persistence, retries and human decisions. LangChain or LangGraph may support this architecture when their abstractions fit the workflow.
Scoped access to search, databases, internal APIs and external services with typed inputs, validated outputs and auditable actions.
Explicit workflow state, branching, checkpoints, durable execution and recovery for work that cannot live inside one request.
Review queues, thresholds, escalation and editable intermediate results for actions that require accountability.
Specialized agents only where decomposition improves quality or ownership enough to justify coordination cost and complexity.
How we make an agentic workflow production-safe
We separate decisions that benefit from a model from rules that should remain deterministic. Every external action has an owner, permission boundary, validation path and recovery behavior.
Identify states, tools, decisions, failure points, approval gates, completion criteria and existing system owners.
Build datasets for routing, extraction or generation and compare model behavior before automating actions.
Implement persistence, queues, idempotency, retries, timeouts, cancellation and human review.
Record model, prompt, tool and state transitions, monitor cost and failures and support controlled configuration rollout.
Agent and orchestration deliverables
The system includes the backend mechanics required for reliable work, not only the agent prompt and tool declarations.
Agent and orchestration deliverables
Behavior systems selected for the experience, world and frame budget.
We create NPC decision-making, navigation, tactics, group behavior, encounter direction and simulation systems. Classical realtime approaches and generative AI can coexist, but each is used only where its behavior, latency and operating cost fit the game.
State machines, behavior trees, utility systems, goal-oriented planning and hybrids organized for readable authoring and debugging.
Nav meshes, grids, custom pathfinding, steering, avoidance and spatial queries for static, procedural or destructible worlds.
Target selection, cover, squads, economies, populations, encounter directors and systemic responses to player behavior.
Server-authoritative NPCs, relevance and bandwidth controls, plus dialogue or content generation where a bounded model improves the product.
How we build AI players can read and developers can tune
We define the behavior the player should perceive before choosing an implementation. Debug views, authoring controls and performance budgets are designed with the runtime system.
Describe goals, information available to the agent, acceptable mistakes, difficulty, fairness and multiplayer authority.
Build a small encounter with visualization and telemetry to test behavior and designer control.
Connect navigation, animation, combat, simulation, authoring data and network ownership.
Test many agents, adverse world states and frame budgets while giving designers useful controls and diagnostics.
Game AI deliverables
The system includes runtime behavior, content-authoring support and the tools required to understand why an agent acted.
Game AI deliverables
TECHNICAL PRIORITIES
Specify the task, baseline, acceptable failure, data rights and human responsibility.
Build representative tests and compare the simplest viable approaches.
Connect models to product data, tools, state, permissions and deterministic controls.
Trace outcomes, measure quality, latency and cost and run regression evaluation before changes.
START WITH THIS DISCIPLINE